Question: “While running for people like my father, i use the following words:
‘This run is addressed to the being of my father Darth Vader’ Is it completely fine to use both relation as well as name to strengthen the connection?”
Answer: Yes Luke, that is perfectly fine.
Continue readingQuestion: “Hi , can you give me ideas on wordings so that i can run for my family members as a whole — and be as effective as doing it individually. It really stresses me out, as i have not been able to do for everyone individually. I have tried to use “family” or “home and family” but my mind pops up every time, and it distracts and asks: what does “family” mean? Is it parents or parents & brother or even grandparents…or what about uncle’s family and cousins. Please help me sort this out.”
Continue readingThere was a question recently about the proper translation of the Quantum Magic Videos affirmations when doing a run for another.
“When running for myself, translating the “you” of the affirmation into “I” makes sense. That part is easy. But, when I am running for another person should this not be the person’s name — such as Susan?”
When running for another, you are running “for” the other person. One becomes a full proxy. “I embrace the Clear Light” translates as the other person embraces the Clear Light.
If you say “Susan embraces the Clear Light” the proxy connection is weakened. Using the third person reference re-enforces the notion “they are not me, I am not them.” That is why I would not do it that way.
By saying “I embrace the Clear Light” even though you clearly know you are doing all of this on behalf of Susan, that will underscore and make more real the proxy connection.
The runner and the person they run for are still individuals, but during the time of the run it is like an overlay where they both occupy the same place and experience the same things. So using “I” is most correct.
Do the run as you would do the run when running for yourself. But you are fully doing it for the other and giving the benefit to them without regard.
Here’s a link to the Quantum Magic Videos youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/quantummagicvideos
Here’s a link to the QMV Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/QMVideos-658686064589297/
Recientemente, se formuló una pregunta sobre la traducción correcta de las afirmaciones de Quantum Magic Videos al hacer un recorrido para los demás.
«Cuando corro para mí, traducir el “tú” de la afirmación a “yo” tiene sentido. Esa parte es fácil. Pero, cuando hago el recorrido para otra persona, ¿no debería ser este el nombre de esa persona, como Susan?»
Cuando se hace el recorrido para otro, se está haciendo el recorrido «para» la otra persona. Uno se convierte en un proxy, un representante, completo. Se traduce «recibo la Luz Clara» cuando la otra persona recibe la Luz Clara.
Si dices «Susan recibe la Luz Clara», la conexión del proxy se debilita. El uso de la referencia en tercera persona refuerza la idea de que «ellos no son yo, yo no soy ellos». Por eso no lo haría de esa manera.
Al decir «recibo la Luz Clara», aunque usted sabe claramente que está haciendo todo esto en nombre de Susan, eso subrayará y hará más real la conexión proxy.
El corredor y la persona para la que se hace el recorrido siguen siendo individuos, pero durante el tiempo del recorrido es como una capa donde ambos ocupan el mismo lugar y experimentan las mismas cosas. Así que usar «Yo» es lo más correcto.
Haz el recorrido como lo harías cuando lo haces para ti mismo. Salvo que lo estás haciendo completamente para el otro y dándole el beneficio sin más.
Aquí hay un enlace al canal de YouTube de Quantum Magic Videos: https://www.youtube.com/c/quantummagicvideos
Aquí hay un enlace a la página de Facebook de QMV: https://www.facebook.com/QMVideos-658686064589297/